Cases 1 - 10 of 20
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
STEPHEN J LUCZO, WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant:
CYNTHIA B TAYLOR, AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Litwin v. Sievert et al
as 2:2021cv01599
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Defendant:
G. Michael Sievert, Timotheus Hottges, Marcelo Claure and others
Nominal Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gervat v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Marta R. Stewart, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Flaugh et al v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
Robert E. Beauchamp, William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Flaugh and Melvyn Klein
Mo v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01614
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
Ellen M. Pawlikowski, William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Hong Yi Mo
Wann et al v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01507
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work, Stephen J. Hadley and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Wann
Faulkner v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01477
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work, Stephen J. Hadley and others
Plaintiff:
John Faulkner
Bushansky v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv07242
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work, Stephen J. Hadley and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Ford v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv07220
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Marta R. Stewart, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
