Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Stoll v. Stoll et al
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
James Frances Stoll and James Francis Stoll
Defendant:
Michael William Stoll, Maryann Teresa Stoll, ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Care-A-Lot Childcare Inc. v. Hemmat Family Limited Liability Company et al
as 3:2021cv00492
Defendant:
DOUGLAS E. SCHWARTZ, HEMMAT FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED SCHWARTZ REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH
Plaintiff:
CARE-A-LOT CHILDCARE, INC. an Oregon corporation doing business as KIDS INC. LEARNING CENTER and Care-A-Lot Childcare Inc. an Oregon corporation doing business as Kids Incorporated Learning Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis Resorts, LLC v. State of Oregon, et al
as 1:2020cv02232
Defendant:
Parks and Recreation Division, The State of Oregon and U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Lewis Resorts, LLC an Oregon Limited Liability Company doing business as Lost Creek Marina doing business as Lost Creek Lake and Marina
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
C6 CAPITAL LLC, a New York limited liability company v. SCRIBNER et al
as 3:2019cv01871
Defendant:
KELVIN B. SCRIBNER and LYNETTE J. SCRIBNER
Plaintiff:
C6 CAPITAL LLC, a New York limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Espiriquetzal v. Quality Loan Services Corporation of Washington et al
as 3:2018cv00157
Defendant:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, In his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, MICHAEL REESE, In his Official Capacity as Multnomah County Sheriff,, MORGAN STANLEY ISIX REAL ESTATE CAPITAL TRUST 2006-1, In its Capacity As Issuing Entity for Morgan Stanley IXIS Real Estate Capital Trust 2006-1, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-1 and others
Plaintiff:
Leroi Espiriquetzal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
