Cases 31 - 40 of 111
LeBlanc v. Woodward et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Thomas LeBlanc
Defendant:
Nathan James Woodward and J&W Agricorp, LLC an Idaho limited liability company doing business as J&W Agricorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Garibay v. PNW Veg Co LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01857
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Mendez Garibay
Defendant:
PNW Veg Co LLC a Washington limited liability company doing business as NORPAC of the PNW, Oregon Potato Company and Lineage Master Re LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Lane County, Oregon
as 6:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Lane County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Cervantes et al v. Young Coconut LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Valentin Cervantes and Felipe Cervantes
Defendant:
Young Coconut LLC domestic limited liability company doing business as Zab Thai and Chuchoke Ngowsagul
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Diachok v. Moxie Investments LLC
as 3:2022cv01506
Counter Defendant:
Mark Diachok
Defendant:
Moxie Investments LLC dba Moxie Investment Funds and Moxie Investments LLC a North Carolina limited liability company doing business as Moxie Investments Funds
Counter Claimant:
Tara Sherbert and Moxie Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Regional Local Union Nos. 846 and 847, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO et al v. LSRI, LLC
as 3:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
Regional District Council Welfare Plan and Trust, Regional District, Council Retirement Plan and Employee Benefit Plans Trust, Regional District Council Training Trust and others
Defendant:
LSRI, LLC a Texas Limited Liability Company doing business as Lone Star Rebar Installers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
United States Of America et al v. Cornerstone Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01350
Plaintiff:
D&B Interiors, LLC United States of America, for the use and benefit of doing business as DBI Construction, United States of America and D & B Interiors, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as DBI Construction
Defendant:
Cornerstone Contracting Inc., WBE - CCI Joint Venture One LLC and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Mena et al v. Portland Drywall Systems Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mena, Adriana Ramirez, Francisco Solorzano and others
Defendant:
Portland Drywall Systems Enterprise, Inc., THE SPANOS CORPORATION, SOUTH COOPER MOUNTAIN APARTMENTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Purelight Power, LLC et al v. Westfall
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Purelight Power, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Purelight Power and PLP Roofing, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Purelight Roofing
Defendant:
Chester Westfall
Counter Defendant:
Purelight Power, LLC and PLP Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Aequitas Capital Management, Inc. et al v. RP Capital, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Aequitas Capital Management, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Aequitas Income Opportunity Fund, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and others
Defendant:
RP Capital, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Strategic Capital Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Norman Gary Price and others
Receiver:
Ronald F. Greenspan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different District
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
