Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shannon v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Respondent:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GCH International, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
GCH International, Inc.
Defendant:
AECOM Hunt, Merrill Iron and Steel, Inc., Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sexton v. Wellmont Health System et al
as 7:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Eric Sexton
Defendant:
Wellmont Health System and MCOT, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Daniel F. Dotson
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Wellmont Health System and MCOT, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Wellmont Health System and MCOT, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Kelvin Eric Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wellmont Health System v. Dotson et al
as 7:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Wellmont Health System
Defendant:
Daniel F. Dotson, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Marine Electric Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marine Electric Company, Inc., Charles A. Wirth and Frances B. Wirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Wagner-Smith Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
The Wagner-Smith Company, The Wagner-Smith Company and The Wagner-Smith Company
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
BMAR and Associates, Inc. v. Midwest Mechanical Group et al
as 5:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
BMAR and Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Midwest Mechanical Group and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
