Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MAACO FRANCHISOR SPV LLC v. BODYWORKS & PAINTING LTD, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04728
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISOR SPV LLC
Defendant:
BODYWORKS & PAINTING LTD, INC., JOSEPH D. LILE and LAURIE L. LILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. BODYWORKS & PAINTING LTD., INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06254
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
BODYWORKS & PAINTING LTD., INC., JOSEPH D. LILE, II and LAURIE L. LILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LILES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv64245
Plaintiff:
CHESTER LILES and GERALDINE LILES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LILES et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81910
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY JEAN LILES and GEORGE E. LILES
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBB et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05095
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. COBB , GARY COOPER , JAMES FRANK and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LILES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv01984
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN A. LILES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LILES v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2009cv92638
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM W. LILES
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LILES v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79363
Plaintiff:
ALFRED LILES
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LILES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75003
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR CLYDE LILES, JR.
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
