Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Boeing Company, The v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) et al
as 1:2012cv02555
Plaintiff:
The Boeing Company
Defendant:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 952 and Local 1588
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO et al
as 2:2010cv06261
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC. , AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. , A.P. MOELLER - MAERSK A/S and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 920, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO et al
as 2:2010cv04950
Petitioner:
NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL I, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 920, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Boeing Company, The v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW)
as 1:2009cv02213
Plaintiff:
Boeing Company, The
Defendant:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 952 and Local 1588
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NORTHEAST AUTO-MARINE TERMINAL v. MARINE WAREHOUSEMEN AND GENERAL FACTORY WORKERS DIVISION OF LOCAL 1588 ILA AFL/CIO
as 3:2008cv02789
Plaintiff:
NORTHEAST AUTO-MARINE TERMINAL
Defendant:
MARINE WAREHOUSEMEN AND GENERAL FACTORY WORKERS DIVISION OF LOCAL 1588 ILA AFL/CIO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
