Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pastorius v. Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series
as 2:2024cv04787
Plaintiff:
Mark Pastorius
Defendant:
Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jeffrey Mazie et al v. Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series et al
as 2:2023cv09241
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mazie and Mark Nieman
Defendant:
Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series, 1-50, inclusive DOES and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
John Byun et al v. Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series et al
as 2:2023cv09243
Plaintiff:
John Byun, Adam Weiss, Allen Ngo and others
Defendant:
Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series, DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Lockton Company, LLC - Pacific Series et al v. Eric D. Kaufman
as 2:2023mc00040
Plaintiff:
Lockton Company, LLC - Pacific Series, Lockton Investment Advisors, LLC, Lockton Investment Securities, LLC f/k/a Lockton Financial Advisors and others
Petitioner:
Alliant Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric D. Kaufman
In Re:
Subpoena to Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. in the Matter of
De Lisser et al v. Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series et al
as 3:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Cedric De Lisser, Christopher Moser and Michael Michelin
Defendant:
Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series, Lockton Insurance Company LLC, Lockton Companies, LLC - Pacific Series a Missouri limited liability company doing business as Lockton Insurance Brokers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Prestige Industries LLC v Applied Underwriters Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00312
Defendant:
Applied Risk Services, Inc., Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc., Applied Underwriters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Prestige Industries LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
