Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sampson v. Mattress Firm Inc et al
as 3:2022cv05455
Plaintiff:
Sondra Sampson
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc., DSI Logistics LLC, Dedicated Transportation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05454
Plaintiff:
Sondra Sampson
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc., DSI Logistics, LLC and Valery Mukhin
Debtor In Possession:
Dedicated Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Quesenberry v. AAA Kartak, Co, et al
as 2:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Realogics Brokerage, LLC, Experience US LLC, Pacific Coast Renovations, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Quesenberry
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Wylder v. Cargill Incorporated et al
as 3:2017cv05506
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wylder
Defendant:
Cargill Incorporated , Cargill Total Logistics LLC, CHS Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacrosse et al v. Pinnacle Workforce Logistics, LLC. et al
as 2:2016cv00904
Plaintiff:
Greg Lacrosse and Lori Lacrosse
Defendant:
Pinnacle Workforce Logistics, LLC , RoadLink Workforce Solutions, LLC , Capstone Logistics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lacrosse et al v. Pinnacle Workforce Logistics, LLC. et al
as 2:2015cv01583
Plaintiff:
Greg Lacrosse and Lori Lacrosse
Defendant:
Pinnacle Workforce Logistics, LLC., RoadLink Workforce Solutions, L.L.C., John Does I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05714
Plaintiff:
Greg Lacrosse and Lori Lacrosse
Defendant:
Pinnacle Workforce Logistics, LLC., RoadLink Workforce Solutions, L.L.C., John Does I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paredes v. Eliason Ranch Trucking LLC et al
as 3:2007cv05174
Plaintiff:
Roberto L Paredes and Roberto L Paredes
Defendant:
Eliason Ranch Trucking LLC, Eliason Ranch Trucking LLC, Eliason Logistics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
