Cases 1 - 6 of 6
LOOS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. et al
as 3:2024cv02810
Plaintiff:
DIANNE SUE LOOS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAULINE PAPIKE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09325
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF PAULINE PAPIKE and MICHAEL LOOS, INDIVIDUALLY AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PAULINE PIKE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPAINES INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOO-LEW v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv00584
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE LOO-LEW
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISH et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FISH, RICHARD J. GAUDY, ANGELO M. AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. MARTIN AARON, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05850
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND
Defendant:
MARTIN AARON, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ASHLAND, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN STANDARD INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05334
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., ASHLAND INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
