Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Knope v. Barr
as 20-3274
Defendant:
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sharon M. Knope
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Caplash v. Johnson
as 18-1523
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jolly Manoj Caplash
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Leon Rodriguez, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service and others
Anghel v. Commissioner of New York State
as 18-552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.D. Maria-Lucia Anghel
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of New York State Department of Educa Mary Ellen Elia, in her official capacity, New York State Department of Health, The Office of Professional Medical Conduct and others
Juste v. Lynch
as 17-574
Petitioner:
Andre Juste
Respondent:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Phillips, U.S. ICE Field Director for the Todd Tryon Field Office and Warden of Immigration Detention Facility and Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General
Lin v. Yate
as 17-194
Petitioner:
Xueqin Lin
Respondent:
Sally Q. Yates, Acting, United States Attorney General and Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Shi v. Session
as 17-190
Petitioner:
Ke-Zi Shi
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Dutra v. Sessions
as 17-177
Petitioner:
Valdenice Dutra
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General and Jeff Sessions, United States Attorney General
Lin v. Lynch
as 17-162
Petitioner:
Hong Lin, AKA Dong Li
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Arguijo-Anariba v. Lynch
as 17-149
Petitioner:
Sonia Arguijo-Anariba
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Lin v. Lynch
as 17-155
Petitioner:
Jian Lin
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
