Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Goodwill Industries of S.E.LA, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff: Goodwill Industries of S.E.LA, Inc. doing business as Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Louisiana, Inc.
Defendant: MT Hawley Insurance Company
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Franz v. National Football League et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv11288
Plaintiff: Charles Franz
Defendant: National Football League, NFL Properties LLC, NFL Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
United States of America ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
as 23-7468
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY BIXLER WOOD
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel Mary Bixler Wood, ALASKA, ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood, CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood and others
Defendant / Appellee: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS PRODUCTS GMBH
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company et al v. Celgene Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv07871
Plaintiff: Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and HMO Louisiana, Inc.
Defendant: Celgene Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Aurobindo Pharma Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Google LLC
as 23-910
Petitioner: Google, LLC
Respondent: The State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
United States of America v. Pharmerica Corporation
as 23-909
Plaintiff: ABC, United States of America, The State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ex rel. Kaveh Askari
Defendant / Appellee: PharMerica Corporation, Pharmacy Corporation of America, Oncomed Specialty Pharmacy, LTD., DBA Onco360 and others
Defendant: DEF, David Froessel, Jeff Kimmel and others
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff: ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee: McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant: DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
Pilat v. Amedisys, Inc.
as 23-566
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Pilat, Relator, United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, State o and Philip Maniscalco, Relator, United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, Sta
Defendant / Appellee: Amadisys, Inc., Does 1-100 and Amedisys, Inc.
Walmart Inc. et al v. Capital One, National Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02942
Counter Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and others
Counter Claimant: Wal-Mart Stores Arkansas, LLC
Defendant: Capital One, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?