Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams v. Wheiler, et al.
as 24-7173
Defendant:
LT GIBNEY, SANDI FRELLY, Captain HUST and others
Plaintiff:
KENT WILLIAMS
Williams v. Leeflang, et al.
as 24-6662
Plaintiff:
KENT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LT GIBNEY, ROBBERT WHEILER, Captain HUST and others
Williams v. Wheiler et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Leeflang, D.W. Martinez, A. Hottinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jody Carr, et al v. Josh Tewalt, et al
as 22-35743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Plaintiff:
DOUBLE CELLED CLOSE CUSTODY INMATES OF IDOC, RANDALL ERICKSON, RONALD BAKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC, CHAD PAGE, AMANDA GENTRY and others
Williams v. Atencio et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Director Atencio, Director Tewalt, Deputy Director Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
John Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Sgt. Laing et al
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
Sgt. Laing, Lt. Gibney, Lt. Nieko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
