Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Effecten-Spiegel AG et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018mc00093
Petitioner: Effecten-Spiegel AG and ARFB Anlegerschutz UG
Respondent: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. , Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and John Thain
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 17-1694
Plaintiff: Joseph Amabile, Louie Amabile, individually & on behalf of Lue Trading, Inc., Norman Byster and others
Petitioner: PFI Diversified Real Asset Fund, PFI Equity Income Fund, PFI Global Diversified Income Fund and others
Respondent: Bank of America Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, UBS AG and others
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant: Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant: EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant: Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
Brandes et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04754
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dawn Bradford, Dana Brandes, Nicole Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Reiburn et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02960
Plaintiff: Ronni Reiburn , Samuel Jorgenson , Derrick L. Chambers and others
Defendant: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Bank Of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker v. Merrill Lynch& Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01959
Plaintiff: Craig M. Walker
Defendant: Merrill Lynch& Co. Inc. and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Blum et al. v.Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01636
Plaintiff: Andrew Blum and Zaq Harrison
Defendant: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. , Merrill Lunch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Bank Of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
IN RE American International G We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4067
Plaintiff: Sharyn Rothstein, Marisa Rothstein, Mollye Rothstein, Objector and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ohio Police And Fire Pension Fund, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and Ohio Public Employees Retirement System
Appellant: Marshall Orloff, American International Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan, American General Agents and Managers Thrift Plan and others
Defendant: Howard Smith, John A. Graf, John Houldsworth and others
Intervenor: Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund and James Connolly
Amicus Curiae: American Benefits Council
Socha v. 110 Church L.L.C.
as 14-2401
Plaintiff - Appellant: Marek Socha and Haline Socha
Defendant - Appellee: 53 Park Place L.L.C., 55 Water Street Condominium, 110 Church L.L.C. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?