Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01118
Defendant: Asset Backed Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: DG Holding Trust, Deutsche Genossenschafts-Hypothekenbank AG and Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG
Shintaku et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00060
Plaintiff: Roxane E. Shintaku and Rosei Shinsato
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation , Goulds Pumps, Inc. and Yarway Corporation
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Ametek, Inc., Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ralston et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff: Wanda J. Ralston and Curtis B. Ralston
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dote v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff: Warren K. Dote
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Agodong v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00021
Plaintiff: Nancy Agodong
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Behlert et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff: Joseph A. Behlert and Maria Luisa Behlert
Defendant: Crane Company , Air Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Atlas Valve Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-16982
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16864
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Appellee: CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Brown et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2012cv00431
Plaintiff: Jane Lorraine Brown , Giles Brown , Peggy Perkins and others
Defendant: Crane Company , Aurora Pump Company , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner: DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent: CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?