Cases 31 - 40 of 222
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 12-3403
Plaintiff:
Dorota Markut, Lucyna Foremska, Richard Racioppi and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank, Logan LLC, One Broadway, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Tully Construction Co., Inc. and City of New York
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 12-3025
Plaintiff:
Dorota Markut, Lucyna Foremska, Richard Racioppi and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Tully Industries, Inc., Deutsche Bank, Logan LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Tully Construction Co., Inc. and City of New York
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
In Re: Combined World Trade
as 12-2964
Plaintiff:
Edgar C. Bayas, Robert Sienkiewicz, Various plaintiffs represented by Cannata/Grochow and others
Defendant:
100 Church, LLC, Zar Realty Management Corporation, Verizon New York Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 12-2963
Plaintiff:
Dorota Markut, Lucyna Foremska, Richard Racioppi and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Tully Industries, Inc., Deutsche Bank, Logan LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Tully Construction Co., Inc. and City of New York
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Merrill Lynch Capital Services v. UISA Finance
as 12-2956
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &Smith, Inc., Merrill Lynch Credit Products, LLC and Merrill Lynch &Co. Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
UISA Finance and USINAS Itamarati S.A.
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRIL
as 1:2012mc00229
Plaintiff:
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MONIQUE JEFFERSON, MARK BANCROFT, MARCI CARRETO, and John Does 1 through 5 Who are as yet Unidentified Employees of Said Entiti
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
IKB International S.A. In Liquidation et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv04036
Plaintiff:
IKB International S.A. In Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woori Bank v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03993
Plaintiff:
Woori Bank
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Merrill Lynch International, Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asset Management Fund et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03791
Plaintiff:
Asset Management Fund, AMF Intermediate Mortgage Fund, AMF Ultra Short Fund and others
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , NB Holdings Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03359
Plaintiff:
Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., NB Holdings Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
