Cases
Assuranceforeningen Skuld (Gjensidig) et al v. M&F Fishing, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00960
Petitioner: Assuranceforeningen Skuld (Gjensidig) and Skuld Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Ltd
Respondent: M&F Fishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
M & F Fishing, Inc. v. American Eagle Fishing LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv00291
Defendant: American Eagle Fishing LLC, Tradition Mariner, LLC aka Tradition Mariner LLC, Tradition Mariner, LLC and others
Plaintiff: M & F Fishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Francisco v. F/V Koorale, U.S. Coast Guard Official No. 545564 et al
as 3:2011cv00828
Plaintiff: John Francisco
Defendant: F/V Koorale, U.S. Coast Guard Official No. 545564, M&F Fishing Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
M & F Fishing, Inc. et al v. Sea-Pac Insurance Managers, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00368
Plaintiff: M & F Fishing, Inc. and M/V Koorale
Defendant: Sea-Pac Insurance Managers, Inc., Raleigh, Schwartz & Powell, Inc., Brown & Brown of Washington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
M & F Fishing, Inc. et al v. Sea-Pac Insurance Managers, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02380
Plaintiff: M & F Fishing, Inc. and M/V Koorale
Defendant: Sea-Pac Insurance Managers, Inc., Raleigh, Schwartz, & Powell, Inc., Brown & Brown of Washington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
M & F Fishing, Inc., et al v. Certain Lloyds of London Under, et al
as 08-56788
Plaintiff - Appellant: M & F FISHING, INC. and M/V KOORALE
Defendant - Appellee: CERTAIN LLOYDS OF LONDON UNDERWRITERS, GE FRANKONA REINSURANCE CO. LTD., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, AKA National Marine Fisheries Services and others
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?