Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fraudulent Filing of Information Returns
Eldridge v. M & M Property Management et al
as 0:2016cv60179
Plaintiff:
Omar Eldridge
Defendant:
M & M Property Management, Kirit Bhalani, Maulik Bhalani and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Eldridge v. M & M Property Management et al
as 6:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Omar Eldridge
Defendant:
M & M Property Management, Kirit Bhalani and Maulik Bhalani
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dyer et al v. M&M Asphalt Maintenance Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01512
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Dyer, Jr. , Michael A. Hill , Robert P. Anderson and others
Defendant:
M&M Asphalt Maintenance Inc., All County Paving, Inc., Jeffrey Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jimenez v. M & M Parking SB, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv22513
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Jimenez
Defendant:
M & M Parking SB, LLC and Andrew Mirmelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dyer et al v. M & M Asphalt Maintenance Inc.
as 6:2015cv00959
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Dyer, Jr. , Henry L. Kemp, Jr. , Marquis D. Grooms and others
Defendant:
M & M Asphalt Maintenance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. M&M Sunglasses, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv61172
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group, S.p.A.
Defendant:
M&M Sunglasses, LLC , Mehmet Orman and Muge Orman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015bk00601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv60459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
