Cases 11 - 19 of 19
GRIFFIN et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05837
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIFFIN, JR. and LYDIA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and WUI M. LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HUDGINS v. A-C PRODUCTS LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31415
Plaintiff:
DARDEN H. HUDGINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCTS LIABILITY TRUST, A.H. BULL AND CO., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BEVIVINO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv07122
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE F. BEVIVINO and PATRICIA BEVIVINO
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and WILLIAM M. LEE, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv42533
Plaintiff:
LEWIS M LEE, SR.
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LEE v. AMERICAN HAWAII CRUISES
as 2:2010cv42534
Plaintiff:
LEWIS M LEE, SR
Defendant:
AMERICAN HAWAII CRUISES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LEE V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35297
Plaintiff:
LEWIS M. LEE, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
LEE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COM et al
as 2:2010cv60038
Plaintiff:
REBECCA M LEE
Defendant:
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COM , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRY , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEE v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77423
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. LEE and CHARLES M. LEE
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEE v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72005
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. LEE, JR.
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
