Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Proxicom Wireless, LLC v. Macy's, Inc et al
as 6:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Proxicom Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc and Macy's Florida Stores, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Macy's, Inc and Macy's Florida Stores, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Proxicom Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv24482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
Hettinger v. Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
as 8:2017cv02974
Plaintiff:
Henry Hettinger
Defendant:
Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
HABERSHAM v. MACY'S FLORIDA STORES, LLC
as 4:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HABERSHAM
Defendant:
MACY'S FLORIDA STORES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adler v. MACY'S FLORIDA STORES, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv22321
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adler
Defendant:
Macy's Florida Stores, LLC. and Macy's Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00692
Plaintiff:
Deborah Clark
Defendant:
Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Macy's Florida Stores, LLC. v. Barlington Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv21363
Plaintiff:
Macy's Florida Stores, LLC
Defendant:
Barlington Group, LLC, Martin A. Pinilla and William O. Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv14029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
