Cases 1 - 10 of 21
JUSTICE, II v. DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05340
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., DOUGLAS M FAMBROUGH III, J. KEVIN BUCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kaufmann v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10379
Plaintiff:
David Kaufmann
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Whitehead v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06764
Plaintiff:
Joann Whitehead
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Sheridan v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03236
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sheridan
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Volpe v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10342
Plaintiff:
Laurie Volpe
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Hopkins v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10345
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Kent v. Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Douglas M. Fambrough, III, J. Kevin Buchi and others
Kim v. OvaScience, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10939
Defendant:
Mary Fisher, OvaScience, Inc., Jonathan Howe and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kim
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Cuenca Aubets v. OvaScience, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10882
Defendant:
Richard Aldrich, Marc Kozin, Mary Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Jordi Cuenca Aubets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Wheby, Jr. v. OvaScience, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01811
Defendant:
OvaScience, Inc, Richard Aldrich, Marc Kozin and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Wheby, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
