Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Martinez et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03725
Plaintiff:
Maria Centeno Martinez and Daniel Mendoza Centeno
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Martinez-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2549
Petitioner:
ANA MARIA DILSIA MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ, GERSON RICARDO AMAYA-MARTINEZ and DIEGO IVAN AMAYA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Martinez-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1474
Petitioner:
ROSA MARIA MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ and ASHLEY ALEXANDRA RIVERA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez de Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1379
Petitioner:
MARIA ESMERALDA MARTINEZ DE ROSALES, ISIDRO LEONEL ROSALES QUIJANO, BRYAN STEVEN ROSALES MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Ivette Portela Martinez, et al
as 23-14023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
IVETTE MARIA PORTELA MARTINEZ and MIGUEL ANGEL MONTALVO VILLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2023cv24197
Plaintiff:
Maria Mercedes Martinez
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
