Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16729
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER BAIRD DUPONT, RICH ROBERTSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arizona;
Defendant:
MARET VESSELLA, Chief Bar Counsel of the State Bar of Arizona; and COLONEL HESTON SILBERT, Colonel, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Public Safety.
Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16490
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARIZONA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, VOTO LATINO and PRIORITIES USA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant:
KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arizona, LARRY NOBLE, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Apache County Recorder, DAVID STEVENS, Nominal Defendant, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, previously named as David Stephens and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
YUMA COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE
State of Arizona, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 21-16118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona and STATE OF MONTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ACLU OF MONTANA and ACLU OF ARIZONA
Arizona Attorneys for C.J., et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 20-16293
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK MILSTEAD, Colonel, in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Public Safety., MARET VESSELLA, Chief Bar Counsel of the State Bar of Arizona;, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arizona; and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANBY, RICH ROBERTSON, CHRISTOPHER BAIRD DUPONT and others
Mikkel Jordahl, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 18-16896
Amicus Curiae:
LAWRENCE GLICKMAN, Professor at Cornell University, 25 ARIZONA LEGISLATORS, GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant:
MATT RYAN, JIM PARKS, in their official capacity as Coconino County Jail District Board of Directors Members, ART BABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MIKKEL JORDAHL and MIKKEL (MIK) JORDAHL, PC
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
Rivko Knox v. Mark Brnovich
as 18-16613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RIVKO KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
DNC, et al v. Michele Reagan, et al
as 18-15845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DSCC, AKA Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and THE ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELE REAGAN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, BILL GATES, Councilman, SUZANNE KLAPP, Councilwoman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
