Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Nourani v. Holden et al
as 3:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Sam Nourani
Defendant:
Christopher A. Holden, William A. Sanger, Claire M. Gulmi and others
Movant:
Ryan Sevy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01397
Plaintiff:
Central Laborers' Pension Fund
Defendant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation, Christopher A. Holden, William A. Sanger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois v. Envision Healthcare Corporation, et al.,
as 3:2017cv01323
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois
Defendant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation , Christopher A. Holden , William A. Sanger and others
Movant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bettis v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01112
Defendant:
Claire M. Gulmi, Christopher A. Holden, Envision Healthcare Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Bettis
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois and Central Laborers' Pension Fund
Consolidated Defendant:
Michael L. Smith, Ronald A. Williams, Richard J. Schnall and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Corvex Master Fund LP and Corvex Select Equity Master Fund LP
Not Classified By Court:
Wells Capital Management, Inc.
Interested Party:
KPMG, LLP
Petitioner:
Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, Michael Avenia, CFG Custom Portfolio Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lemay v. Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02265
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lemay
Defendant:
Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. , William A. Sanger , Michael L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Voth v. Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02213
Plaintiff:
Eric Voth
Defendant:
Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc., William A. Sanger, Michael L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
