Cases
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff: AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant: VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sara Hassman v. Mark Hassman, et al
as 17-55533
Plaintiff - Appellant: SARA HASSMAN
Defendant - Appellee: MARK F. HASSMAN, SEASTROM, SEASTROM AND TUTTLE, entity no. C0995775 (formally Seastrom and Seastrom), CLAUDIA SILBAR, Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Dept. C63 and others
Sara Hassman v. Mark F. Hassman et al
as 2:2017cv01081
Defendant: Marshall R. Cole, Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho and Associates P.C., Does and others
Plaintiff: Sara Hassman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?