Cases 1 - 10 of 540
Reese v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Scott Reese
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mor v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Mia Love Mor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sadler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Ann Sadler
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Luddy v. Dzurenda
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred D. Luddy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Kenneth Williams, J. Benson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
William Martin
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gurule v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Gurule
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mora v. C. Chestnut et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Martin Xavier Mora
Defendant:
C. Chestnut, Mr. D'Amico and Dr. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Scott Reese
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Avila v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Jose N. Avila
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gando v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Fatin Sawa Gando
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
