Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Marvin Faulkner v. Anna Loftus, et al
as 19-3020
Defendant / Appellee:
PIERCE AND ASSOCIATES, BRYAN GOMEZ, CODILIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Marvin Faulkner v. Anna Loftus, et al
as 18-2531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA M. LOFTUS, PIERCE AND ASSOCIATES, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Marvin Faulkner v. Anna Loftus, et al
as 18-2025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA M. LOFTUS, PIERCE AND ASSOCIATES, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Marvin Faulkner v. Anna Loftus, et al
as 17-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA M. LOFTUS, PIERCE AND ASSOCIATES, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Faulkner v. Gomez et al
as 1:2017cv04286
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner
Defendant:
Bryan Gomez, Anna M. Loftus, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Faulkner v. Townsend et al
as 1:2017cv02488
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner
Defendant:
Baseemah M. Dear Townsend, Anna M. Loftus, William B Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Faulkner et al v. Loftus et al
as 1:2016cv02432
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner and Samuel C Umunna
Defendant:
Anna M. Loftus, William Farrow, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Faulkner et al v. Otto et al
as 1:2015cv03344
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner and Samuel C Umunna
Defendant:
Michael Francis Otto , Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Urban Partnership Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAULKNER v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv79478
Plaintiff:
MARVIN FAULKNER
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
