Cases 1 - 10 of 623
Dunn v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company
as 3:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Kathrine Marie Dunn
Defendant:
Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Kline v. Brookdale Assisted Living
as 1:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Mary Kline
Defendant:
Brookdale Assisted Living
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Lidiana Marie Mendoza
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Boyce v. St. Vincent DePaul (Lane Co) et al
as 3:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Sonja Marie Boyce
Defendant:
St. Vincent DePaul (Lane Co) and GBM Gardner Beckley Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Professional House Cleaning by Mary G, LLC v. GMP, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Professional House Cleaning by Mary G, LLC
Defendant:
GMP, LLC and Sonia Medina Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Stevens v. Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Coralie Jane Stevens
Defendant:
Nicole Marie Stevens, Wesley Allen Ream, Jr., Wesley Allen Ream, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eldridge et al v. Home Forward et al
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Eldridge and Catherine Betty Jean Hoagland
Defendant:
Home Forward, Ivory Matthews, Cristina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eldridge et al v. Home Forward et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Eldridge and Catherine Betty Jean Hoagland
Defendant:
Home Forward, Irvine Matthews, Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
