Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 22-80140
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Petitioner:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Mosafer, Inc., et al v. Elliott Broidy, et al
as 22-55296
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOSAFER, INC., MOSAFER E-COM, INC. and GOMOSAFER
Defendant / Appellant:
ELLIOTT BROIDY, BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and CIRCINUS, LLC
Defendant:
GEORGE NADER, THE IRON GROUP, INC., DBA Ironistic.Com, SCL SOCIAL LIMITED and others
Counter Defendant:
STATE OF QATAR, ABU ISSA HOLDING WLL, ASHRAF ABU ISSA and others
Mosafer, Inc., et al v. Elliott Broidy, et al
as 22-55265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOSAFER, INC., MOSAFER E-COM, INC. and GOMOSAFER
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOTT BROIDY, BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CIRCINUS, LLC and others
Defendant:
THE IRON GROUP, INC., DBA Ironistic.Com, SCL SOCIAL LIMITED, PROJECT ASSOCIATES UK LTD and others
Counter Defendant:
STATE OF QATAR, ABU ISSA HOLDING WLL, ASHRAF ABU ISSA and others
Mosafer Inc. et al v. Elliot Broidy et al
as 2:2021cv06320
Plaintiff:
MOSAFER INC., MOSAFER E-COM, INC. and GOMOSAFER
Defendant:
ELLIOT BRODY, GEORGE NADER, BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
