Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kenneth Clark v. Matthew Cate
as 18-55452
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Mark Easley v. Jim MacDonald
as 14-55546
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK RAYMOND EASLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JIM MACDONALD and MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Kyle Greenspan v. Matthew Cate
as 14-55258
Petitioner - Appellant:
KYLE BLAKE GREENSPAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
James Marlow v. Matthew Cate
as 14-55199
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES FEDERICK MARLOW
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Steven Splawn v. Matthew Cate
as 12-17277
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL SPLAWN
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Darren Hilton v. Matthew Cate
as 12-55932
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARREN ALEXES HILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
Douglas McShane v. Matthew Cate
as 12-55575
Petitioner - Appellee:
DOUGLAS BRIAN MCSHANE
Respondent - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Samuel Confectioner v. Matthew Cate
as 12-15159
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL LOFTY CONFECTIONER
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Paul Thomas v. Matthew Cate
as 12-55012
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL ALLEN THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Vincent Perez v. Matthew Cate
as 11-56033
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
