Cases 1 - 10 of 21
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 3:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 1:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LEWAKOWSKI v. AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv03751
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEANNA LEWAKOWSKI, MATTHEW SMOAK and JAMIE KAKUGAWA
Petitioner:
DANIEL WESSLER and NATHAN BENNETT
Lead Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAASE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv17778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maxwell v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2018cv08266
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Plaintiff:
Katrina Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. R. MAXWELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
as 1:2017cv11412
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
R. MAXWELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
RUAN v. LG CHEM, LTD. et al
as 2:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
NANCY RUAN
Defendant:
LG CHEM, LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
