Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A. v. PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Defendant:
PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH, LLC and SIGNATURE MD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES v. PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH and SIGNATURE MD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SJ DIRECT LLC v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv04388
Plaintiff:
SJ DIRECT LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, GLENN STREIDEL, UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
v. SJ DIRECT LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04385
Defendant:
SJ DIRECT LLC, MICHAEL BROWN, GLENN STREIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
KORPUSINSKI v. REGALBUTO et al
as 2:2016cv03047
Plaintiff:
JOZEF A. KORPUSINSKI
Defendant:
AUSTIN REGALBUTO and COMMERICIAL HARDWARE OF MD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
e-MDs,Inc. v. COMPUEDGE COMPUTER CONSULTING, INC.
as 2:2009cv04168
Plaintiff:
e-MDs, INC.
Defendant:
COMPUEDGE COMPUTER CONSULTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED et al v. MDS, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv02398
Plaintiff:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED, DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. and REDDY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
MDS, INC., MDS PHARMA SERVICES (US), INC. and MDS PHARMA SERVICES (CANADA,) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MDS, INC. et al v. COVANCE, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv03207
Plaintiff:
MDS, INC. and MDS PHARMA SERVICES (US) INC.
Defendant:
COVANCE, INC. and NIGEL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
