Cases 41 - 50 of 2,474
Chiro et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 2:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Ned J. Chiro and Brenda Chiro
Defendant:
Bayer AG , GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quackenbush et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2010cv04506
Plaintiff:
Ronald Quackenbush, Sr. and Sharon Seymour Quackenbush
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv00864
Plaintiff:
Patricia Haynes, Harry William Hilton, Vester Lynn Horton and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bilal v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02755
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Ali Bilal
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc and Vioxx Claims Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ware et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2006cv08376
Plaintiff:
Constance Ware, Betty Hernandez, Margaret Victorian and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Boudreaux et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 6:2010cv00546
Plaintiff:
Janet L Boudreaux and Walter A Boudreaux
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc and Corporations X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A. Griffin
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Honeycutt v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2006cv03396
Plaintiff:
Katy Honeycutt
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2009cv07475
Plaintiff:
Dariel L Stephens
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oklahoma Healthcare Authority v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2009cv07218
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Healthcare Authority, Oklahoma Healthcare Authority and Oklahoma Healthcare Authority
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Marine Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
