Cases 41 - 49 of 49
WOODMAN v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
MARILYN WOODMAN
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DEANGELIS v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEANGELIS
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VERDI, et al v SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
CIRO VERDI and EILEEN VERDI
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MAURER et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00393
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. MAURER and SIDNEY COOPER
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCGARRY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. MCGARRY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WEISS v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WEISS
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KLITZNER v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
JAY KLITZNER
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WEISS v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00318
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WEISS
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
POLK v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
RITA POLK
Defendant:
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
