Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,838
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice
as 24-1299
Plaintiff: HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Ahmed v. Garland
as 24-1284
Petitioner: MOHAMMAD SHAMIM AHMED, RUJY BEGUM and SAMIRA BEGUM
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ham-Pena v. Garland
as 24-1287
Petitioner: CARLOS ALBERTO HAM-PENA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rana v. Garland
as 24-1286
Petitioner: BODRUZZAMAN RANA, TAHIRA ZAMAN INAISHA, AYSHA ZAMAN AVA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Roblero v. Garland
as 24-1277
Petitioner: BLADIMIR GONZALEZ-ROBLERO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chicaiza-Caisaguano v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner: MYRIAN YOLANDA CHICAIZA-CAISAGUANO, DYLAN DARIO GUACHICHULLCA-CHICAIZA and CRISTIAN DANIEL GUACHICHULLCA-CHICAIZA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Akramov v. Garland
as 24-1251
Petitioner: IZZATJON IKRAMOVICH AKRAMOV, MALIKA FAZLIDDINOVNA AMINOVA and MUHAMMADAMIN IZZATJONOVICH IKRAMOV
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-1235
Petitioner: FRANCISCO ANTONIO MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roldan-Guaraca v. Garland
as 24-1244
Petitioner: SEGUNDO OLMEDO ROLDAN-GUARACA, ANA LUCIA DAQUILEMA-PUCULPALA and THALIA ALEXANDRA ROLDAN-DAQUILEMA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vivanco Barrientos De Allcca v. Garland
as 24-1231
Petitioner: SONIA ERIKA VIVANCO BARRIENTOS DE ALLCCA, ABRAHAM EUGENIO ALLCCA VIVANCO and BENEDICTO EUGENIO ALLCCA VEGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?