Cases
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04596
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04597
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04139
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03757
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
In Re: MF Global Holdings Ltd. Investment Litigation
as 1:2012md02338
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robert A. Daly, Jr., Juan P. Arvelo, PS Energy Group Inc and others
Defendant: Thomas F. Connolly, Michael G. Stockman, Frederick R. Demler and others
Plaintiff: Daniel M Pierce, Joseph Niciforo, Jerome Vrabel and others
Consolidated Defendant: Lebenthal & Co., LLC, Commerz Markets LLC, Natxis Securities North America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Augustus International Master Fund, L.P., Union Asset Management Holding AG, Paradigm Equities Ltd. and others
Lead Plaintiff: Virginia Retirement System and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
Not Yet Classified: Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System, MF Global Holdings Ltd., as Plan Administrator and Rogers Varner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ritch v. MF Global Holdings LTD.
as 1:2010cv00979
Plaintiff: Scott Ritch and Scott Ritch
Defendant: MF Global Holdings LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?