Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27283
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68204
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04595
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86293
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59026
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy v. United States Of America
as 1:2020cv21371
Plaintiff:
Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCarthy v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McCarthy v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
as 0:2007cv60104
Plaintiff:
Dennis Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
Secretary for the Department of Corrections and Secretary for the Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarthy v. McDonough
as 0:2007cv60093
Plaintiff:
Dennis Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
James McDonough, James McDonough and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
