Cases 1 - 10 of 86
MILLER v. EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv23011
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS MILLER
Defendant:
EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SCOTT TARIFF and BRIAN CAHILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
TOMASZEWSKI et al v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv03888
Plaintiff:
SLAWOMIR TOMASZEWSKI, ARTUR PRAZAK, MICHAL JAN SZWARC and others
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BUSHANSKY v. STONEMOR INC. et al
as 3:2022cv05235
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
STONEMOR INC., ANDREW AXELROD, SPENCER E. GOLDENBERG and others
BUSHANSKY v. STONEMOR INC. et al
as 1:2022cv05235
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
STONEMOR INC., ANDREW AXELROD, SPENCER E. GOLDENBERG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JONES v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JONES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
WILSON v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv13340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
