Cases 21 - 30 of 1,212
HIGGENBOTHAM v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68101
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HIGGENBOTHAM
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC. , BEAZER PLC, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68107
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E POE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68092
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C RUNGE
Defendant:
A C & S INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LA HOOD v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68131
Plaintiff:
HARRY M LA HOOD
Defendant:
A C & S INC , C S R LTD , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CARD v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68103
Plaintiff:
BOB L. CARD
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC. , CHICAGO FIREBRICK, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILLIG v. AC & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68120
Plaintiff:
GLENN F HILLIG
Defendant:
AC & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGMENT CORPORATION and others
OWSLEY v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68090
Plaintiff:
DONALD E. OWSLEY
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RONK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv68104
Plaintiff:
DENISE RONK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , CSR LTD, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68099
Plaintiff:
LOWELL O RAY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC , GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BISHOP v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68136
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E BISHOP
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC , GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
