Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Ceil Norris, et al v. MK Holdings, Inc., et al
as 17-6078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEIL WALKER NORRIS, in her role as Co-trustee and beneficiary of the Walker Marital Trust #2, the Vernon Walker Trust For Cecilia Walker and The Vernon Walker Trust for Deloss Walker, as principal and Beneficiary of the Ceil Walker Rollover IRA, WALKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. and CEIL T. WALKER REVOCABLE TRUST
Defendant - Appellee:
MK HOLDINGS, INC., dba Regions Morgan: Keegan Trust Company and REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Warwick et al v. RMK High Income Fund, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02653
Plaintiff:
James E Warwick and Barbara Rhea Warwick
Defendant:
RMK High Income Fund, Inc., RMK Strategic Income Fund, Inc., RMK Advantage Income Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
C. Daniels, et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al
as 10-6335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. FRED DANIELS, as trustee and litem in substitution for Regions Bank, dba Regions Morgan Keegan Trust as trustee for the Juanita H. Schaffer irrevocable trust, THE TRUST UNDER WILL OF MARY B. WELCH, THE TRUST UNDER LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF J.S. COOPER FOR BENEFIT OF CORRINE COOPER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC., MK HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Daniels et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02800
Plaintiff:
C. Fred Daniels, C. Fred Daniels, C. Fred Daniels and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Morgan Asset Management, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Norris et al v. MK Holding, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02830
Plaintiff:
Ceil Walker Norris, Ceil Walker Norris, Walker & Associates, Inc. and others
Defendant:
MK Holding, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
