Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
MONSANTO CO V RALPH
as 03-1243
Defendant-Appellant: KEM L. RALPH (dba Ralph Brothers Farms)
Plaintiff-Appellee: MONSANTO COMPANY
MONSANTO CO V THOMASON
as 01-1643
Defendant: 3-T COTTON FARMS OF RAYVILLE, INC. and LASLEY D. THOMASON
Defendant-Appellant: BALE-A-DAY, INC., CHARLES F. THOMASON, DALLAS THOMASON and others
Plaintiff-Appellee: DELTA AND PINE LAND COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
MONSANTO CO V THOMASON
as 01-1642
Defendant-Appellant: 3-T COTTON FARMS OF RAYVILLE, INC., BALE-A-DAY, INC., CHARLES F. THOMASON and others
Plaintiff-Appellee: DELTA AND PINE LAND COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
MONSANTO V US
as 01-1526
Plaintiff-Appellant: MONSANTO COMPANY
HOHENBERG BROS CO V US
as 01-1460
Plaintiff-Appellant: A.C. MONK AND COMPANY, INC., ADM/GROWMARK RIVER SYSTEMS, INC., AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES
MONSANTO CO V MCFARLING
as 01-1390
Defendant-Appellant: HOMAN MCFARLING, HOMAN MCFARLING and HOMAN MCFARLING
Plaintiff-Appellee: MONSANTO COMPANY, MONSANTO COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
MONSANTO COMPANY: , and
MONSANTO CO V STRATEMEYER
as 01-1349
Defendant-Appellee: EUGENE STRATEMEYER, EUGENE STRATEMEYER and EUGENE STRATEMEYER
Plaintiff-Appellant: MONSANTO COMPANY, MONSANTO COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
MONSANTO V PIONEER HI-BRED
as 01-M668
Respondent: MONSANTO COMPANY, MONSANTO COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
MONSANTO V PIONEER HI-BRED
as 01-1283
Plaintiff-Appellee: MONSANTO COMPANY, MONSANTO COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
Defendant-Appellant: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. and PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC.
IN RE PIONEER HI-BRED
as 01-M661
Respondent: MONSANTO COMPANY, MONSANTO COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
Petitioner: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. and PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?