Cases 21 - 30 of 518
FERRARO v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04979
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION #1-25, JANE ROES #1-25, JOHN DOES #1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI FERRARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARGEL et al v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04978
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION #1-25, JOHN DOES #1-25, JUUL LABS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SHARGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLUCH v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04821
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, PHILLIP MORRIS, USA, INC., JUUL LABS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JASON GLUCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAPLANTE v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04828
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE LAPLANTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. MERCK et al
as 2:2019cv20274
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO INC and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. POWELL et al
as 2:2019cv03687
Defendant:
AIMM, INC. and TERRELL POWELL
Plaintiff:
WARREN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stahlnecker et al v. Morris et al
as 4:2019cv00858
Plaintiff:
Dale C. Stahlnecker and Michele A. Stahlnecker
Defendant:
Sandra L. Morris and D&F Travel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALBRIGHT et al v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2019cv00430
Defendant:
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC., ALPHA O. SACKO, AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ALBRIGHT and JASON M. ALBRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20275
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Judith K. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20134
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Ernest Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
