Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Rithianos v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008nc70010
Plaintiff:
George Rithianos and George Rithianos
Defendant:
National City Corporation, National City Corporation, National City Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Douglas v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00952
Plaintiff:
Deborah Douglas
Defendant:
National City Corporation, James S. Broadhurrst, Christopher M. Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rithianos v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00751
Plaintiff:
George Rithianos and George Rithianos
Defendant:
National City Corporation, Administrative Committee for The National City Savings and Investment Plan, Jon E. Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gunning v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Gunning
Defendant:
National City Corporation, Jon E. Barfield, James S. Broadhurst and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Whitlow et al v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Ella R. Whitlow, Sharon A. Deucher, Robert Steinberg and others
Defendant:
National City Corporation, Administrative Committee for The National City Savings and Investment Plan, Jon E. Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Elsinghorst v. National City Corporation, et al
as 1:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
James Elsinghorst, James Elsinghorst, James Elsinghorst and others
Defendant:
National City Corporation, Administrative Committee for The National City Savings and Investment Plan, Shelley J. Seifert and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Morris v. American Electric Power Long Term Disability Plan
as 2:2007cv00183
Plaintiff:
Paul D Morris
Defendant:
American Electric Power Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
