Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic
as 23-444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kathleen Ashton, as Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Ashton, deceased and on behalf of all survivors of Thomas Ashton, Josephine Alger, as Administrator of the Estate of Frederick Alger, as CoExecutors of the Estate of David D. Alger, deceased and on behalf of the survivors of David D. Alger, Angelica Allen, as Administrator of the Estate of Eric Allen, deceased and on behalf of all survivors of Eric Allen and others
Defendant:
Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Osama Bin Laden, Estate of Muhammad Atef and others
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
United States of America v. Hage (Salim)
as 23-6185
Defendant:
WADIH EL-HAGE, FAZUL ABDULLAH MOHAMMED, MOHAMED SADEEK ODEH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MAMDOUH MAHMUD SALIM, Abu Hajer al Iraqi and Abu Hajer
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hage (Mamdouh Mahmud Salim)
as 21-3148
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, AKA Abu Hajer al Iraqi, AKA Abu Hajer
United States of America v. Hage (Mamdouh Mahmud Salim)
as 21-2442
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, AKA Abu Hajer al Iraqi, AKA Abu Hajer
Fraser et al v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army et al
as 1:2017cv07317
Plaintiff:
Susanne Fraser
Defendant:
Al Qaeda Islamic Army, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, ESTATE OF OSAMA BIN LADEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
United States of America v. Hage (Wadih El Hage)
as 13-1755
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar, Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-'Owhali, AKA Khalid Salim Saleh Bin Rashed, AKA Moath, AKA Abdul Jabbar Ali Abel-Latif and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur
United States of America v. Hage (Ghailani)
as 11-320
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wadih El Hage, AKA Abdus Sabbur, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Harun Fazhl, AKA Fazhl Abdullah, AKA Fazhl Khan, Mohamed Sadeek Odeh, AKA Abu Moath, AKA Noureldine, AKA Marwan, AKA Hydar and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, AKA Fupi, AKA Abubakary Khalfan Ahmed Ghaliliani
O'Neill v. The Republic of Iraq
as 1:2004cv01076
Defendant:
Estate of Fayez Ahmed, Barzan E-Tikriti, Al Taqwa Trade, Property and Industry Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A. O'Neill, Carol O'Neill, Christine Irene O'Neill and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Kevin Albero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
