Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Machuca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv10214
Plaintiff:
Michelle Machuca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Mackie v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10237
Plaintiff:
Keith Mackie
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Wang v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10143
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Neely v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10171
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Neely
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Columbia Banking System, Inc., Cascade Merger Sub, Inc. and others
Machuca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv06027
Plaintiff:
Michelle Machuca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Machuca-Gonzalez et al v. Bost et al
as 1:2014cv08690
Plaintiff:
Luis Machuca-Gonzalez and Ivette Rodriguez
Defendant:
Olatunji M. Bost and Bost Transport, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06789
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
