Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Minchew v. United States America et al
as 3:2024cv05116
Plaintiff:
Nicole Minchew
Defendant:
United States America and Madigan Army Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hurlbut et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv05819
Plaintiff:
Katye Hurlbut and Dustin Hurlbut
Defendant:
United States, Madigan Army Medical Center, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Young v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv05231
Plaintiff:
JERITA R. YOUNG and Jerita R Young
Defendant:
United States of America d/b/a Madigan Army Medical Center and United States of America a governmental agency doing business as Madigan Army Medical Center doing business as United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Barlow Richards, LLP v. King et al
as 2:2020cv00921
Plaintiff:
Barlow Richards, LLP and Barlow Richards, LLP doing business as Clear Counsel Law Group
Defendant:
Madigan Army Medical Center, TriCare West, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Poore-Rando et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv05094
Plaintiff:
Samantha Poore-Rando and Matthew Rando
Defendant:
United States of America, Madigan Army Medical Center, Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Sari Hanner v. United States Army, et al
as 09-35686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARI A. HANNER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY and MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER
Hanner v. United States Army et al
as 3:2008cv05728
Plaintiff:
Sari A Hanner
Defendant:
United States Army and Madigan Army Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Gobin v. Madigan Army Medical Center
as 3:2007cv05677
Plaintiff:
Tamera Gobin
Defendant:
Madigan Army Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
