Cases 1 - 10 of 10
INZA et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv03054
Defendant:
SRIKANT M. DATAR, LUIS A. UBINAS, SRINIVASAN GOPALAN and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC, RICHARD INZA and MICHAEL INZA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv03051
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., ANDRE ALMEIDA, TIMOTHEUS HOTTGES and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY, SRINIVASAN GOPALAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Litwin v. Sievert et al
as 2:2021cv01599
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Defendant:
G. Michael Sievert, Timotheus Hottges, Marcelo Claure and others
Nominal Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Binns Blount v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01661
Defendant:
Stephen R. Kappes, Masayoshi Son, Gordon M. Bethune and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette E. Binns Blount
Muehlgay v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01622
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Julius Genachowski, Stephen Kappes and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Muehlgay
Burgains v. Sprint/United Management Company
as 1:2018cv24176
Plaintiff:
Barry Burgains
Defendant:
Sprint/United Management Company and Marcelo Claure
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Klein v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01551
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Patrick Doyle, Julius Genachowski and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Klein
Gober v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv02523
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Gordon M. Bethune, Julius Genachowski and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gober
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
