Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Johnson v. Borg Warner Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00128
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slade v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Benton T. Slade
Defendant:
Crane Co., Garlock, Inc., Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Collier v. ITT Industrial, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01275
Plaintiff:
Michael Otis Collier
Defendant:
ITT Industrial, Inc., FMC Corp., Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Johnson v. Foster Wheeler Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv01254
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Johnson
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Ltd., Dorr-Oliver Eimco USA, Inc., Alfa Laval Flow/Tri-Clover Inc./Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Watson v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00921
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Watson
Defendant:
Garlock, Inc., Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company, McCord Gasket Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sanders v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00134
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Garlock, Inc., Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company, McCord Gasket Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McKenzie v. Ingersoll-Rand Company et al
as 1:2007cv00668
Plaintiff:
Alfred William McKenzie
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company, Deere & Company, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
White et al v. Owens-Illinois et al
as 1:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
George Wallace White, Felicia White, Sylvia White and others
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Honeywell International, Inc., Budd Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
