Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Tennenbaum v. Gamble, Jr. et al
as 1:2018cv00967
Plaintiff:
Ruth Tennenbaum
Defendant:
John W. Gamble, Jr., Joseph M. Loughran, III, Rodolfo O. Ploder and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Weyl et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00802
Plaintiff:
Nancy A.K. Weyl , John Weyl and Erste-Sparinvest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H.
Defendant:
Richard Smith, John J. Kelley, III, David Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
IN RE EQUIFAX, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Teamster Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan
Defendant:
John W. Gamble, Jr., Joseph M. Loughran, III, Rodolfo O. Ploder and others
Movant:
Robert L. Bax and George Assad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Teamster Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan v. Gamble et al
as 1:2017cv04402
Plaintiff:
Teamster Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan
Defendant:
John W. Gamble, Jr., Joseph M. Loughran, III, Rodolfo O. Ploder and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marshall et al
as 1:2013cv03032
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Paul Marshall , Bridge Securities, LLC , Bridge Equity, Inc. and others
Garnishee:
Regions Bank
Intervenor_defendant:
Robin L Marshall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Carpenters Health &, et al v. Coca-Cola Co, et al
as 1:2000cv02838
Plaintiff:
Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund, Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund of Philidelphia & Vicinity and Gaetan Lavalla
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Not Classified By Court:
Brian E. McDonough, Charles B. Reiner, Constance E. Haddad and others
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company, James E. Chestnut, Douglas Daft and others
Petitioner:
Tamara Minick-Scokalo, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and FBI
Special Master:
Hunter R. Hughes, III and John T. Marshall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
