Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Smith v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Richard Smith, III
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Levy v. Luo et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Shmuel Levy
Defendant:
Jason Luo, James Taylor, Albert Li and others
Ballard v. ChannelAdvisor Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
ChannelAdvisor Corporation, Timothy Buckley, David Spitz and others
Lawrence v. GP Strategies Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
GP Strategies Corporation, Scott N. Greenberg, Marshall S. Geller and others
Reinhardt v. GP Strategies Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
Charles Reinhardt
Defendant:
GP Strategies Corporation, Scott N. Greenberg, Adam H. Stedham and others
Carlisle v. Southwestern Energy Company et al
as 1:2021cv01177
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
Southwestern Energy Company, John D. Gass, S.P. Johnson, IV and others
Vanmersbergen v. Welbilt, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00822
Defendant:
The Middleby Corporation, Middleby Marshall Inc., Cynthia M. Egnotovich and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Vanmersbergen
Smith v. Aerohive Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01359
Defendant:
Frank Marshall, Remo Canessa, John Gordon Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Smith
Plumley v. Aerohive Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01322
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Clover Merger Sub, Inc., John Gordon Payne, Remo E. Canessa and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
