Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Raul Quiroz v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 21-56044
Petitioner / Appellant: RAUL BECERRA QUIROZ
Respondent / Appellee: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, Warden of Kern Valley State Prison, Delano Substituted for Martin D Biter
Edward Ray, Jr. v. A. Oliva, et al
as 19-17431
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN D. BITER, Chief Deputy Warden, G. GARCIA, Accounting Officer Specialist, S. FIGUEROA, Office Technician Accounting Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Wilmer Alvarado v. Martin Biter, et al
as 14-55535
Petitioner - Appellant: WILMER ALEIX ALVARADO
Respondent - Appellee: MARTIN D. BITER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, The and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, For the
Denell Caver v. Martin Biter
as 14-70865
Petitioner: DENELL CAVER
Respondent: MARTIN D. BITER
Kavin Rhodes v. Martin Biter
as 14-70204
Petitioner: KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Respondent: MARTIN D. BITER
Carlos Gonzales v. Martin Biter
as 13-17052
Petitioner - Appellant: CARLOS RICKY GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee: MARTIN D. BITER
Maurice Farmer v. Martin Biter
as 13-56601
Petitioner - Appellant: MAURICE FARMER
Respondent - Appellee: MARTIN D. BITER
Clarence Dews v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-72664
: In re: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Petitioner: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest: MAURICE JUNIOUS, Warden, MARTIN D. BITER, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor
Clarence Dews v. Edmund Brown, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-16282
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Defendant - Appellee: EDMUND G. BROWN, MAURICE JUNIOUS, Warden and MARTIN D. BITER, Warden
Clarence Dews v. Edmund Brown, et al
as 13-15806
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE LEON DEWS
Defendant - Appellee: EDMUND G. BROWN, MAURICE JUNIOUS and MARTIN D. BITER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?